acrimonious的問題,透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們挖掘到下列精選懶人包

acrimonious的問題,我們搜遍了碩博士論文和台灣出版的書籍,推薦Dobranski, Stephen寫的 Reading John Milton: How to Persist in Troubled Times 和Offord, Derek的 Ayn Rand and the Russian Intelligentsia: The Origins of an Icon of the American Right都 可以從中找到所需的評價。

另外網站acrimonious adjective - Definition, pictures, pronunciation and ...也說明:Oxford Collocations DictionaryAcrimonious is used with these nouns: debate; dispute; divorce … ... Word Originearly 17th cent. (in the sense 'bitter, pungent'): ...

這兩本書分別來自 和所出版 。

國立中正大學 犯罪防治研究所 戴伸峰所指導 邱珮綺的 正義世界信念與網路霸凌態度之關聯研究:以敵意為中介變項 (2020),提出acrimonious關鍵因素是什麼,來自於正義世界信念、網路霸凌態度、敵意、正義魔人、鍵盤酸民。

而第二篇論文國立中山大學 應用數學系研究所 郭美惠所指導 趙子宜的 時間序列改變點的研究 (2019),提出因為有 模型改變點 、傳統時間序列模型、長短期記憶模型、一卡通資料的重點而找出了 acrimonious的解答。

最後網站Acrimonious - Wikipedia則補充:Acrimonious · Search for Acrimonious in Wikipedia to check for alternative titles or spellings. · Start the Acrimonious article, using the Article Wizard if you ...

接下來讓我們看這些論文和書籍都說些什麼吧:

除了acrimonious,大家也想知道這些:

Reading John Milton: How to Persist in Troubled Times

為了解決acrimonious的問題,作者Dobranski, Stephen 這樣論述:

A captivating biography that celebrates the audacious, inspiring life and works of John Milton, revealing how he speaks to our times.John Milton is unrivalled--for the music of his verse and the breadth of his learning. In this brisk, topical, and engaging biography, Stephen B. Dobranski brushes

the scholarly dust from the portrait of the artist to reveal Milton’s essential humanity and his unwavering commitment to ideals--freedom of religion and the right and responsibility of all persons to think for themselves--that are still relevant and necessary in our times.Milton’s epic poem, Paradi

se Lost, is considered by many to be English poetry’s masterpiece. Samuel Johnson, not one for effusive praise, claimed that from Milton’s books alone the Art of English Poetry might be learned. But Milton’s renown rests on more than his artistic achievements. In a time of convulsive political turmo

il, he justified the killing of a king, pioneered free speech, and publicly defended divorce. He was, in short, an iconoclast, an independent, even revolutionary, thinker. He was also an imperfect man--acrimonious, sometimes mean. Above all, he understood adversity. Afflicted by blindness, illness,

and political imprisonment, Milton always sought to bear up and steer right onward through life’s hardships.Dobranski looks beyond Milton’s academic standing, beyond his reputation as a dour and devout purist, to reveal the ongoing power of his works and the dauntless courage that he both wrote abou

t and exemplified.

acrimonious進入發燒排行的影片

正義世界信念與網路霸凌態度之關聯研究:以敵意為中介變項

為了解決acrimonious的問題,作者邱珮綺 這樣論述:

近年來網路霸凌事件頻傳,其中正義魔人與鍵盤酸民更是層出不窮,他們在網路上尖酸刻薄的言論以及對他人進行道德正義綁架的行為,不僅可能使受害者心理受創、喪失生命,更使得彼此對立與衝突的情況增加,進而影響整個社會與網路世界的安全,有鑑於此,了解他們可能會去參與網路霸凌行為的動機與心理狀態刻不容緩。因此,本研究旨在探討人們對於社會正義、霸凌受害者的看法如何影響其看待網路霸凌行為的過程,以正義世界理論為出發點,透過他們內心對於社會正義的認知,以及對於網路霸凌行為的認同與否,來釐清正義世界信念與網路霸凌態度的關係,並將敵意作為中介的角色,探討敵意的心理狀態所造成的影響,了解正義世界信念是否會透過敵意的情緒

、認知與行為傾向而影響網路霸凌的態度。在研究對象與方法上,則以二十歲(含)以上之成年人為對象,並透過立意抽樣與在社群平台上發放網路問卷的方式來招募受試者,共獲得有效問卷452份。研究結果顯示正義世界信念與網路霸凌態度之間有關聯,且正義世界信念也對於網路霸凌態度有預測力,敵意則在兩者之間有中介的影響。

Ayn Rand and the Russian Intelligentsia: The Origins of an Icon of the American Right

為了解決acrimonious的問題,作者Offord, Derek 這樣論述:

This book examines the writings of the American novelist Ayn Rand, especially The Fountainhead (1943) and Atlas Shrugged (1957), which Rand considered her definitive statement about the need for an unregulated free market in which superior humans could fully realize themselves by living for no-on

e but themselves. It explores Rand’s conception of American identity, which exalted individualism and capitalism, and her solution for saving the modern American nation, which she believed was losing the spirit of its 18th- and 19th-century founders and frontiersmen, having been degraded morally and

economically by the rampant socialism of the mid-20th-century world. Derek Offord crucially goes on to analyse how Rand’s writings functioned as a vehicle in which she, a Russian-Jewish writer born in St Petersburg in 1905, engaged with ideas that had long animated the Russian intelligentsia. Her c

onception of human nature and of a utopian community capable of satisfying its needs; her reversal of conventional valuations of self-sacrifice and selfishness; her division of humans into an extraordinary minority and the ordinary mass; her comparison of competing civilizations - in all these areas

, Offord argues that Rand drew on Russian debates and transposed them to a different context. Even the type of novel she writes, the novel of ideas, is informed by the polemical methods and habits of the Russian intelligentsia. The book concludes that her search for a brave new world continues to ha

ve topicality in the 21st century, with its populist critiques of liberal democracies and acrimonious debates about countries’ moral, social, and economic priorities and their identities, inequalities, and social tensions.

時間序列改變點的研究

為了解決acrimonious的問題,作者趙子宜 這樣論述:

傳統時間序列模型已經發展了很長一段時間,而進以年隨著深度學習越來越熱門,在時間序列的資料上也產生了長短期記憶模型這種用來處理時間相關的資料。本論文對傳統時間序列模型偵測是否有模型改變點,同時也對長短期記憶模型偵測,看長短期記憶能否克服重大事件對資料結構的改變。除以之外,本論文也對高雄市公車系統的一卡通資料,針對2017年所推出之政策"冬季大眾運輸免費搭"所造成搭乘的改變做出分析