Scrupulous的問題,透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們挖掘到下列精選懶人包

Scrupulous的問題,我們搜遍了碩博士論文和台灣出版的書籍,推薦Broad, C. D.寫的 C. D. Broad: Key Unpublished Writings 和Broad, C. D.的 C. D. Broad: Key Unpublished Writings都 可以從中找到所需的評價。

另外網站Scrupulosity - Wikipedia也說明:Scrupulosity is characterized by pathological guilt/anxiety about moral or religious issues. ... It is sometimes called "scrupulousness", but that word properly applies ...

這兩本書分別來自 和所出版 。

國立臺灣大學 心理學研究所 張素凰、林耀盛所指導 徐偉恩的 思考行動混淆對強迫傾向者負向評價的影響 (2021),提出Scrupulous關鍵因素是什麼,來自於強迫症、思考行動混淆、負向評價、字詞判斷作業。

而第二篇論文國立臺北科技大學 技術及職業教育研究所 林淑珍、林宜玄所指導 吳小芬的 臺北市高級中等學校學生知覺父母教養方式與學生組織公民行為之研究 (2020),提出因為有 臺北市高級中等學校、父母教養方式、學生組織公民行為的重點而找出了 Scrupulous的解答。

最後網站Scrupulous | Spotify則補充:The Departure: Taking Flight0. Popular releases. Albums. Contraband. Memeplex. Featuring Scrupulous. Scrupulous Radio. Fans also like ...

接下來讓我們看這些論文和書籍都說些什麼吧:

除了Scrupulous,大家也想知道這些:

C. D. Broad: Key Unpublished Writings

為了解決Scrupulous的問題,作者Broad, C. D. 這樣論述:

C. D. Broad (1887-1971) was a British philosopher who taught for many years at Trinity College, Cambridge. Possessing extremely wide-ranging interests, Broad made significant contributions to the mind-body problem, perception, memory, introspection, the unconscious, the nature of space, time, and

causation. He also wrote extensively on the philosophy of science, ethics, the history of philosophy, and the philosophy of religion and had an abiding interest in ’psychical research’-a subject he approached with the disinterested curiosity and scrupulous care that is characteristic of his philoso

phical work. Whilst overshadowed in his own time by figures such as Russell, Moore, and Wittgenstein, he is acknowledged to have anticipated important developments in several fields, such as emergence in philosophy of science, sense perception, and the ’growing block’ theory of time in metaphysics.

Although Broad published many books in his lifetime, this volume is unique in presenting some of his most interesting unpublished writings. Divided into five clear sections, the following figures and topics are covered: AutobiographyHegel and the nature of philosophyFrancis BaconHume’s philosophy of

the self and beliefF. H. BradleyThe historical development of scientific thought from Pythagoras to Newton CausationChange and continuityQuantitative methodsPoltergeistsParanormal phenomena.Each section is introduced and placed in context by the editor, Joel Walmsley. The volume also includes an en

gaging and informative foreword by Simon Blackburn. It will be of great value to those studying and researching the history of twentieth-century philosophy, metaphysics, and the recent history and philosophy of science, as well as anyone interested in Broad’s philosophical thought and his place in t

he history of philosophy.

Scrupulous進入發燒排行的影片

思考行動混淆對強迫傾向者負向評價的影響

為了解決Scrupulous的問題,作者徐偉恩 這樣論述:

思考行動混淆是強迫症一個重要的認知構念。思考行動混淆可能影響個體對其侵入性想法、相關事件的負向評價。過去有研究發現高思考行動混淆者對於負向評價的反應時間較短;然而,該研究為相關研究,並未操弄思考行動混淆。因此,本研究擬誘發思考行動混淆,以探討思考行動混淆在強迫傾向者之負向評價所扮演的角色。本研究依照莫斯利強迫量表及思考行動混淆量表篩選出高、低強迫傾向的大學生各24位,透過改良之句子填空作業來誘發思考行動混淆,並以字詞判斷作業探討思考行動混淆對強迫傾向者負向評價的影響。本研究包含兩個受試者間因子強迫組別(高、低強迫傾向)、操弄作業(思考行動混淆誘發作業、控制作業),兩個受試者內因子字詞種類(清

潔、檢查、憂鬱、一般負向、中性)與時間(前測、後測)。本研究假設在誘發思考行動混淆後,相較於低強迫組,高強迫組對強迫詞的反應時間變快。本研究結果部分支持假設:在檢查詞的部分,接受誘發作業的高強迫組的參與者在後測反應時間顯著變快了,但是低強迫組的參與者反應時間在前、後測之間沒有顯著變化;相反的,接受控制作業的低強迫組參與者在後測反應時間顯著變快了,但是高強迫組參與者的反應時間在前、後測之間沒有顯著變化。透過本研究結果將可釐清思考行動混淆對強迫傾向者之負向評價的影響,作為未來探討思考行動混淆與其他心理疾患的病理機制之參考,亦可提供未來強迫症心理治療的方向。具體而言,緩和強迫疾患者對其因思考行動混淆

而引發的負向情緒、評價的涵容度,或調整相關認知偏誤,以減緩心理困擾。

C. D. Broad: Key Unpublished Writings

為了解決Scrupulous的問題,作者Broad, C. D. 這樣論述:

C. D. Broad (1887-1971) taught for many years at Trinity College, Cambridge. A philosopher of extremely wide-ranging interests, Broad made significant contributions to philosophy of mind, metaphysics, ethics and the history and philosophy of science. He also had a longstanding interest in ’psychical

research’--a subject he approached with the disinterested curiosity and scrupulous care that is characteristic of his philosophical work. The author of several books, his most important works are Scientific Thought (1923), The Mind and Its Place in Nature (1925), and Examination of McTaggart’s Phil

osophy (1933-1938). Joel Walmsley is a Lecturer in the Department of Philosophy at University College Cork, Ireland. He is the author of Mind and Machine (2012), and co-author of Mind: A Historical and Philosophical Introduction to the Major Theories (2006).

臺北市高級中等學校學生知覺父母教養方式與學生組織公民行為之研究

為了解決Scrupulous的問題,作者吳小芬 這樣論述:

本研究旨在瞭解臺北市高級中等學校學生父母教養方式與學生組織公民行為之差異情形。以109學年度高級中等學校學生為研究對象,自編「臺北市高級中等學校學生知覺父母教養方式與學生組織公民行為」調查問卷為研究工具,共發放1,110份調查問卷。施測後所得資料以描述性統計、單一樣本t檢定、獨立樣本t檢定及單因子變異數分析、事後比較等統計方法加以分析,其結論如下:一、臺北市高級中等學校學生知覺父母教養方式以「開明權威」為最高,其次依序為「專制權威」、「寬鬆放任」、「忽視冷漠」。二、臺北市高級中等學校學生組織公民行為以「預先知會」為最高,其次依序為「利他助人」、「公民道德」、「恪守本分」、「運動家精神」。三、

臺北市高級中等學校學生知覺父母教養方式會因「性別」不同有顯著差異。四、臺北市高級中等學校學生知覺父母教養方式會因「家中子女數」不同有顯著差異。五、臺北市高級中等學校學生知覺父母教養方式會因「家庭結構」不同有顯著差異。六、臺北市高級中等學校學生知覺父母教養方式之「開明權威」與「專制權威」,對其組織公民行為之影響顯著高於「寬鬆放任」、「忽視冷漠」。