Riot Account的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們挖掘到下列精選懶人包

Eat Your Mind: The Life and Work of Kathy Acker

為了解決Riot Account的問題，作者McBride, Jason 這樣論述：

The first full-scale authorized biography of the pioneering experimental novelist Kathy Acker, one of the most original and controversial figures in 20th-century American literature.Kathy Acker (1947-1997) was a rare and almost inconceivable thing: a celebrity experimental writer. Twenty-five years

after her death, she remains one of the most original, shocking, and controversial artists of her era. The author of visionary, transgressive novels like Blood and Guts in High School; Empire of the Senses; and Pussy, King of Pirates, Acker wrote obsessively about the treachery of love, the limitati

ons of language, and the possibility of revolution. She was notorious for her methods--collaging together texts stolen from other writers with her own diaries, sexual fantasies, and blunt political critiques--as well as her appearance. With her punkish hairstyles, tattoos, and couture outfits she lo

oked like no other writer before or after. Her work was exceptionally prescient, taking up complicated conversations about gender, sex, capitalism, and colonialism that continue today. Acker’s life was as unruly and radical as her writing. Raised in a privileged but oppressive Upper East Side Jewis

h family, she turned her back on that world as soon as she could, seeking a life of romantic and intellectual adventure that led her to, and through, many of the most thrilling avant-garde and countercultural moments in America: the births of conceptual art and experimental music; the poetry wars of

the 60s and 70s; the mainstreaming of hardcore porn; No Wave cinema and New Narrative writing; Riot grrls, biker chicks, cyberpunks. As this definitive biography shows, Acker was not just a singular writer, she was also a titanic cultural force who tied together disparate movements in literature, a

rt, music, theatre, and film. A feat of literary biography, Eat Your Mind is the first full-scale, authorized life of Acker.Drawing on exclusive interviews with hundreds of Acker’s intimates as well as her private journals, correspondence, and early drafts of her work, acclaimed journalist and criti

c Jason McBride offers a thrilling account and a long overdue reassessment of a misunderstood genius and revolutionary artist. Jason McBride’s work has appeared in TheNew York Times Magazine, New York magazine, The Believer, The Village Voice, TheGlobe and Mail (Toronto), Hazlitt, and many others

. He lives in Toronto. Eat Your Mind is his first book.

Riot Account進入發燒排行的影片

臺灣新聞媒體臉書專頁發布香港反送中運動報導的新聞框架與新聞偏向之研究：以四大報為例

為了解決Riot Account的問題，作者張俐禎 這樣論述：

香港2019年發生的「反送中運動」警民衝突的場景令人印象深刻，但人們對於該事件的認知從何而來？本研究以「新聞框架」理論的觀點出發，藉此探討新聞報導再現「香港反送中運動」的過程中，受到何種新聞框架影響，而展現不同的社會真實面向（Entman, 1993）。另外，過往研究也發現，新聞媒體在報導新聞事件時，可能受媒體立場之影響，而在報導中呈現「新聞偏向」之情勢（Hackett, 1984; Bennett, 1995）。至於其他影響新聞真實之因素，如新聞框架與消息來源、新聞偏向與消息來源，以及議題與消息來源之間的關係在本文也有所討論。本研究採內容分析法，探討台灣四家主要新聞媒體《自由時報》、《蘋果

日報》、《聯合報》及《中國時報》於其臉書新聞粉絲專頁發布的相關報導，並以網路社群上的「集體監看」之概念（Bruns, 2018），篩選出549則新聞報導作為研究樣本。研究結果發現，台灣新聞媒體在臉書新聞粉絲專頁上發布的「香港反送中運動」新聞報導，以「情感框架」使用的比例最高，其次分別為「歸因框架」、「衝突框架」與「道德框架」，而不同新聞媒體在使用新聞框架上也有所差異。其中，《自由時報》與《蘋果日報》傾向使用「情感框架」；《聯合報》傾向使用「歸因框架」；《中國時報》則傾向使用「衝突框架」。此外，「情感框架」與主要消息來源為「網友」的新聞報導呈相關性。至於在新聞偏向方面，《自由時報》在「支持反送中

」的新聞偏向上比例最高，而《中國時報》在「反對反送中」的新聞偏向上比例較高。在新聞報導的主要消息來源與新聞在臉書專頁發布的數量方面，各報均有所差異；至於在反送中各主要議題上，則是以引述「示威抗議者」與「網友」的比例較高。此外，研究也發現，新聞偏向與主要消息來源為「網友」的新聞報導呈相關性，且報導偏向「支持香港反送中運動」。最後，本文也反思了新聞媒體如何在香港反送中運動當中再現社會真實，以及新聞工作者在社會運動當中所扮演的角色。

Lincoln’’s Lie: A True Civil War Caper Through Fake News, Wall Street, and the White House

為了解決Riot Account的問題，作者Mitchell, Elizabeth 這樣論述：

This ＂delicious, suspenseful . . . and cleverly written romp through a dramatic and forgotten moment in American history＂ reveals how Lincoln manipulated the media during the Civil War--shining new light on the current ’fake news’ crisis (Elizabeth Gilbert)In 1864, during the bloodiest days of th

e Civil War, two newspapers published a call, allegedly authored by President Lincoln, for the immediate conscription of 400,000 more Union soldiers. New York streets erupted in pandemonium. Wall Street markets went wild. When Lincoln sent troops to seize the newspaper presses and arrest the editors

, it became clear: The proclamation was a lie. Who put out this fake news? Was it a Confederate spy hoping to incite another draft riot? A political enemy out to ruin the president in an election year? Or was there some truth to the proclamation--far more truth than anyone suspected? Unpacking this

overlooked historical mystery for the first time, journalist Elizabeth Mitchell takes readers on a dramatic journey from newspaper offices filled with heroes and charlatans to the haunted White House confinement of Mary Todd Lincoln, from the packed pews of the celebrated preacher Reverend Henry War

d Beecher’s Plymouth Church to the War Department offices in the nation’s capital and a Grand Jury trial. In Lincoln’s Lie, Mitchell brings to life the remarkable story of the manipulators of the news and why they decided to play such a dangerous game during a critical period of American history. He

r account of Lincoln’s troubled relationship to the press and its role in the Civil War is one that speaks powerfully to our current political crises: fake news, profiteering, Constitutional conflict, and a president at war with the press.

從多元文化主義觀點檢視紐西蘭及台灣媒體報導紐西蘭基督城槍擊案

為了解決Riot Account的問題，作者周孟蓁 這樣論述：

2019年3月15日，紐西蘭基督城的清真寺發生了一起震驚全球的槍擊案。白人槍手持半自動化槍枝分別在努爾清真寺（Al Noor Mosque）和林伍德伊斯蘭中心（Linwood Islamic Centre）進行掃射，造成近百位穆斯林傷亡。這起事件也紛紛引起國際間的大幅關注與報導，台灣媒體也不例外。在案發後，紐西蘭總理Jacinda Ardern隨即召開記者會譴責白人槍手「恐怖襲擊」的行為，並帶頭支持聲援受害族群穆斯林，使紐西蘭社會由上而下都對穆斯林採取愛與同理的態度，一同聲援穆斯林。其中，紐西蘭媒體的報導論述，對於整個紐西蘭社會支持聲援穆斯林的態度扮演著重要角色。因此，本研究透過「多元文化主

義新聞學」的觀點，以紐西蘭最大報紙《NZ Herald》作為媒體的研究樣本，分析紐西蘭媒體是如何報導與詮釋這起白人與穆斯林的衝突事件，並且納入台灣媒體《聯合報系》進行比較觀察，探討兩國媒體在報導論述中，是如何建構穆斯林、移民、弱勢／少數團體，以及白人加害者的形象。研究發現，政府對穆斯林採取多元支持的態度，促使《NZ Herald》大篇幅報導受害族群穆斯林的故事與群眾支持穆斯林的報導，為受害族群發聲。透過政府、媒體與社會三方共同的努力，使穆斯林在關於本案的報導中，已經逐漸擺脫以往的負面刻板形象。而台灣媒體《聯合報系》雖然不像紐西蘭媒體一樣有全面性支持穆斯林的論述與行動，該報的論述已經展現出「白人

也會是壞人」、「穆斯林可能也會是受害者」的觀點。此外，關於白人槍手的形象，《NZ Herald》與《聯合報系》都進行負面形象化的報導，使特定形象的白人，被貼上了新的集體負面標籤。